Marek
  • Marek
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Commander in Chief
22 years ago
lol hey yeah that would be good cuz usa and china have planes so give gla ships!
UserPostedImage
Overlord
22 years ago
so what the gla would suddenly be pushed back into the middle ages? no ships should be added they are just another way to waste money and time building as most maps wouldnt be able to support ships and when you play generals you really dont think about sea units do you? also whoever said that crap about realism i have this to say, it is an rts game, if it was realistic then usa would win all the time and it isnt based entirely on realism. 1 have you ever seen a laser tank or an emperor tank? have you ever heard of speaker towers that magically heal you? tanks in real life move a hell of a lot faster than the ones in generals, automatic weapons ARE actually automatic miniguns dont look like rifles, in real life ppl dont level up stripes when they kill each other. it is a game for entertainment purposes without these unrealistic units and whatever the game wouldnt be that great its more challenging and fun when chinooks drop lots of tanks in ur base, its boring when 1 chinook drops 1 tank or whatever its more fun when ur infantry gen and u put ecm tanks in front of ur bunkers and watch the stealth fighter missles miss and their plans are ruined and you have a laugh then nuke their base for insulting you with futile attempts to destroy you. its all also about balance because 1 nuke would really wipe out an entire base instead of just a few structures. i rest my case.
Overlord Industries...Technology and Warfare of tomorrow!
sai
  • sai
  • 54.5% (Neutral)
  • Private
22 years ago
overlord is so right. the game isnt realstec if they would have whanted to put ship they could they justt diciedid it wasnt in place
Marek
  • Marek
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Commander in Chief
22 years ago
FFS! Who brought this topic back to life?. This is/was a dead topic it means no-more people to post, but.... Its not breaking the rules so carry on!.
UserPostedImage
incia
  • incia
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Commander in Chief
22 years ago
Wasn't it you Marek who brought this topic to live?
KingRaptor89
22 years ago
bah. ships. GLA ships when they're in e middle east? i don;t think so..wad r dey gonna hav? lousy motorboats vs huge air craft carriers??
TIS IS IT. IM TIRED OF THIS FORUM. PLEASE DELETE ME.
Warbringer
22 years ago


its all also about balance because 1 nuke would really wipe out an entire base instead of just a few structures. i rest my case.

Overlord wrote:


The nuke in Generals is a BFLBM. Also known as BattleField Launched Ballistic Missile. It wouldn't destroy a whole base but destory all buildings n units. n u do know man cannot run around shooting with a minigun. coz of the strong recoil they have...
Blbpaws
  • Blbpaws
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Administrator
22 years ago
Generals is not super realistic. It would be boring if it was.
UserPostedImage
Warbringer
21 years ago
in some cases yes but sumtyms not. like in generals ZH the fighters dont have a machine gun on em. like the a10 thunderbolt. most tanks have 2 machine guns n GL Launchers. Those would b alrite. and infantries with grenades. and should also have inaccurate missiles.
Marek
  • Marek
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Commander in Chief
21 years ago
actuallt it wasn't me who brought this topic back to life it was...Overlord. Damn I hate it when people do this. Bring dead topics back to life. I used to but I got my post count reduced becuase of it.

regards,

marek 😉 0(-_-)0
UserPostedImage
ArtilleryMaster
21 years ago
Just an idea: instead of shipyards, a ship can be called in to the map. It would appear where you click like an attack tunnel and leave after awhile like a spectre.
Let the fireballs fly!