|
|
Tank
|
22
|
|
|
|
Infantry
|
23
|
|
|
|
Nuke
|
4
|
|
|
|
Airforce
|
6
|
|
|
|
SuperWeps
|
14
|
|
|
|
Laser
|
24
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
21
|
|
|
|
Toxin
|
8
|
|
|
|
Demo
|
11
|
|
|
Guests can't vote. Try login or register.
|
 MajorJoined: 12/20/2006(UTC)
Posts: 169
Location: United Kingdom
|
|
My opinion is likely to change as I improve
You will not forget this devils power |
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 5/26/2006(UTC)
Posts: 441
Location: Australia
|
Odd, couldn't see poll until logged off haha.
Surely the people who voted Infantry General thought the question was Worst as in Worst to verse... Otherwise I seriously want to infantry spam them to oblivion... within 10 minutes. He's so imbalanced early game, it's not even funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 12/11/2006(UTC)
Posts: 118
Location: South Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 GeneralJoined: 10/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,598
Location: New Zealand
|
YOU ARE WISE, YOUNG JIMMI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Joined: 9/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,550
Location: USA
|
the laser gen would be number 2 for me, the fact that his main advantage is tanks and laser turrets makes him very weak, i really believe that generals could have gone into much more detail and specialization with his units |
Look, at the gaping holes 1 inch in front of you. I missed
Flyin' high in sky, dropping bombs, and sayin' bye bye |
|
|
|
|
|
General Joined: 10/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,598
Location: New Zealand
|
Man, I completely 100% agree with Ace for once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Joined: 9/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,550
Location: USA
|
i think that is what, the third time |
Look, at the gaping holes 1 inch in front of you. I missed
Flyin' high in sky, dropping bombs, and sayin' bye bye |
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 1/17/2007(UTC)
Posts: 147
Location: Singapore
|
Hmmm... Fleetatks is right. I use infantry general because I like star Wars clone wars. using the infantries let me mimic this scene but with red guards not clones.
I was versing with my friend and he was using tank. i pwned him by outrunning his base with my large minnigunners. his tanks could only pick off one by one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 5/26/2006(UTC)
Posts: 441
Location: Australia
|
Comando112 wrote:I was versing with my friend and he was using tank. i pwned him by outrunning his base with my large minnigunners. his tanks could only pick off one by one. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Tank General still retains Flame Tank right? If so, he should've beat you to a pulp :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Joined: 10/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,598
Location: New Zealand
|
Flame tanks have bad range though, the minigunners would prolly kill it before it got in range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Joined: 9/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,550
Location: USA
|
gattling tanks, as well and the are vertran, they can take out infnatrry very fast, and he still has migs wo can deploy their flame misses, although on a suicide run in a desperate situatuion |
Look, at the gaping holes 1 inch in front of you. I missed
Flyin' high in sky, dropping bombs, and sayin' bye bye |
|
|
|
|
|
 ColonelJoined: 1/23/2004(UTC)
Posts: 67
Location: USA
|
steatlh, i can never do anything good with him
dont get laser wrong...very powerful if u manage ur power
inf and tank are sweet only when ur units are heroic? (is that after or before elite?, lol havent played in a long time hehe)...cause they are fast and pwn so quickly |
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400@3ghz|4Gb RAM|NVIDIA Geforce 9800GTX+(on order)|500GB HDD |
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 5/26/2006(UTC)
Posts: 441
Location: Australia
|
Twii Light wrote:
Flame tanks have bad range though, the minigunners would prolly kill it before it got in range.
Minigunners are great in terms of damage, but not THAT great. Merely two Flame Tanks, with or without Black Napalm upgrade can kill a group of minigunners. If you're lazy and it's a huge mass, lay down the firewall, crispy elite infantry ^^ Reason why I said Flame instead of Gattling is because he mentioned his friend needed to pick his infantry off one by one, which the Gattling does. The initial start up time might also give the minigunners a bit of a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Joined: 10/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,598
Location: New Zealand
|
No, flame tanks don't have THAT much health. They wouldn't get many minigunners if they have a lot of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 5/26/2006(UTC)
Posts: 441
Location: Australia
|
How many are you talking about? >< It's still equal monetary values here, if you decide to chuck 2 hordes of minigunners at me, well that's a ***** if I've got at most 1 flame tank :P I still think Tank General would have a high chance of defending it off compared to sides such as USA or Stealth early on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colonel Joined: 6/2/2006(UTC)
Posts: 961
Location: USA
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
xDeliverancex wrote:...But I cant stand the stralth Gen. I just dont like him. No distinct reason why. Stealth gen is the infantry gen without the infantry (no tanks) advantadge: stealth tactics, good against: people who are scared easily.... |
Email me if you ever need help (edited signature November 6th, 2014) |
|
|
|
|
|
General Joined: 10/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,598
Location: New Zealand
|
Scared? How can you be scared of the Stealth General. Thas silly, downright silly.
But I do love using the Stealth General.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Commander in ChiefJoined: 5/17/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,602
Location: Sweden
|
Twii Light wrote:
Scared? How can you be scared of the Stealth General. Thas silly, downright silly.
But I do love using the Stealth General.
Sneak attacks are sceary? "Ooh my God, where did my buildings disappear, probably ghosts" :o
|
|
|
|
|
|
 CaptainJoined: 10/19/2006(UTC)
Posts: 65
Location: Finland
|
I don't think the Laser General is that great. I don't know how to use the Toxin General either, so that's my 2nd vote :) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 5/26/2006(UTC)
Posts: 441
Location: Australia
|
Incia wrote:Twii Light wrote:
Scared? How can you be scared of the Stealth General. Thas silly, downright silly.
But I do love using the Stealth General.
Sneak attacks are sceary? "Ooh my God, where did my buildings disappear, probably ghosts" :o If Sneak Attack = Emergency Tunnel, it's not scary since enemy gets audio of "Sneak attack detected!".. GPS Scramble is even less scary without heavy duty vehicles.. The only thing scary is going "Ehh? EHH? WTF ub3r lag, I can't move my own units!" I spose for a newb, going into where the enemy base should be and finding nothing there since it's all camonetted would be scary too.. Edit: Oh and @misacorp, you use Toxin General exactly like you use normal GLA, unless you usually play with Bomb Trucks and Terrorists. At least for me, what's your trouble in using it? Edited by user Sunday, January 21, 2007 2:36:35 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest (7)
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
