|
|
Tank
|
22
|
|
|
|
Infantry
|
23
|
|
|
|
Nuke
|
4
|
|
|
|
Airforce
|
6
|
|
|
|
SuperWeps
|
14
|
|
|
|
Laser
|
24
|
|
|
|
Stealth
|
21
|
|
|
|
Toxin
|
8
|
|
|
|
Demo
|
11
|
|
|
Guests can't vote. Try login or register.
|
 Commander in ChiefJoined: 5/17/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,602
Location: Sweden
|
timewarp wrote:
The laser general requires completely different strategies than other generals. You cannot rush with the laser general. It's all about turtling, and this really is the only general you can do that with.
Except SW General.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 CaptainJoined: 8/17/2006(UTC)
Posts: 91
Location: USA
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
|
Incia wrote:timewarp wrote:
The laser general requires completely different strategies than other generals. You cannot rush with the laser general. It's all about turtling, and this really is the only general you can do that with.
Except SW General. What do you mean? |
To a pessimist, the glass is half empty. To an optimist, the glass is half full. To a programmer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander in Chief Joined: 5/17/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,602
Location: Sweden
|
timewarp wrote:Incia wrote:timewarp wrote:
The laser general requires completely different strategies than other generals. You cannot rush with the laser general. It's all about turtling, and this really is the only general you can do that with.
Except SW General. What do you mean? I mean SW General is the ultimate turtling general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Joined: 8/17/2006(UTC)
Posts: 91
Location: USA
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
|
Incia wrote:timewarp wrote:Incia wrote:timewarp wrote:
The laser general requires completely different strategies than other generals. You cannot rush with the laser general. It's all about turtling, and this really is the only general you can do that with.
Except SW General. What do you mean? I mean SW General is the ultimate turtling general. Not against infantry general. EMP turrets are really ineffective against infantry. And if the other player is smart, they would know that USA can't get ranger without first killing some enemy troops. So an infantry rush against EMP gen would work. |
To a pessimist, the glass is half empty. To an optimist, the glass is half full. To a programmer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander in Chief Joined: 5/17/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,602
Location: Sweden
|
Ranger? they are USA's first normal infantries, everyone can buy Rangers from the first start.
And some Flashbangs or Humvee's full of Rangers would work.
But yeah... Infantry General is the best general versus SW General.
But every other general are good versus the lame Laser General.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Joined: 8/17/2006(UTC)
Posts: 91
Location: USA
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
|
Incia wrote:
Ranger? they are USA's first normal infantries, everyone can buy Rangers from the first start.
And some Flashbangs or Humvee's full of Rangers would work.
But yeah... Infantry General is the best general versus SW General.
But every other general are good versus the lame Laser General.
You have that backwards. Lasers are powerful against everything. They do higher damage than shells or missiles, they cannot be shot down, or stopped by PDLs, they are instant, and they often finish their salvo by shooting at a much greater distance than what should be their maximum. They are powerful against infantry, vehicles, and aircraft, and the only thing that can safely hit them are china's artillery, or the rocket buggy, (and of course an Aurora, but those can safely hit anything) which can easily be destroyed by just about any unit behind the turret. They can shoot down SCUDs, and tomahawks. The laser turret is basically amazing. |
To a pessimist, the glass is half empty. To an optimist, the glass is half full. To a programmer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
 MajorJoined: 5/26/2006(UTC)
Posts: 441
Location: Australia
|
timewarp wrote:Incia wrote:
Ranger? they are USA's first normal infantries, everyone can buy Rangers from the first start.
And some Flashbangs or Humvee's full of Rangers would work.
But yeah... Infantry General is the best general versus SW General.
But every other general are good versus the lame Laser General.
You have that backwards. Lasers are powerful against everything. They do higher damage than shells or missiles, they cannot be shot down, or stopped by PDLs, they are instant, and they often finish their salvo by shooting at a much greater distance than what should be their maximum. They are powerful against infantry, vehicles, and aircraft, and the only thing that can safely hit them are china's artillery, or the rocket buggy, (and of course an Aurora, but those can safely hit anything) which can easily be destroyed by just about any unit behind the turret. They can shoot down SCUDs, and tomahawks. The laser turret is basically amazing. Which of those benefits effect the Laser Crusader?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commander in Chief Joined: 5/17/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,602
Location: Sweden
|
Lasers are actually bad versus infantry, so one Rebel Ambush or something could be enough to destroy your Power plants. Then all your Laser Crusaders and Laser turrets become useless.
Or if you get rushed by hundreds of Minigunners from the Infantry General, then Laser General can't do anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Joined: 8/17/2006(UTC)
Posts: 91
Location: USA
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
|
Incia wrote:
Lasers are actually bad versus infantry, so one Rebel Ambush or something could be enough to destroy your Power plants. Then all your Laser Crusaders and Laser turrets become useless.
Or if you get rushed by hundreds of Minigunners from the Infantry General, then Laser General can't do anything.
Only the lasers on laser crusaders. Laser turrets are very potent against infantry. |
To a pessimist, the glass is half empty. To an optimist, the glass is half full. To a programmer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 10/2/2006(UTC)
Posts: 172
Location: USA
|
I wouldn't say the laser general is the worst. A good rush can murder anyone but late in the game those laser turrets become quite nasty if set up right. Against minugunners, if you have them supplemented by pathfinders...well there goes the neighborhood. |
"It will look real nice when it's done." |
|
|
|
|
|
Major Joined: 12/20/2006(UTC)
Posts: 169
Location: United Kingdom
|
Tank Gen is the worst, no long range makes him practically useless late game, & i do mean useless, he also has way to many weaknesses & doesn't bost the economy & early game advantage of the nuke or infantry gen counterparts |
My opinion is likely to change as I improve
You will not forget this devils power |
|
|
|
|
|
 GeneralJoined: 10/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,598
Location: New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Joined: 12/27/2004(UTC)
Posts: 237
Location: Malaysia
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
no, i think laser gen is the weakest.
laser crusaders are pathetic |
 Are you ready? |
|
|
|
|
|
Commander in Chief Joined: 5/17/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,602
Location: Sweden
|
Darus wrote:
no, i think laser gen is the weakest.
laser crusaders are pathetic
Finally someone who thinks like I do, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest (6)
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
